Should the IRS restrict talk about politics from the pulpit?

[NY Times]
Bill Keller, an evangelist based in Florida, runs “Liveprayer.com,” an Internet call-in program. Because he receives a government tax exemption, he is prohibited by law from endorsing or opposing candidates for public office. But during the Republican primary battle, Mr. Keller proclaimed to his followers and the news media that “a vote for Mitt Romney is a vote for Satan.”
Now Mr. Keller says he is being investigated by the Internal Revenue Service for involvement in partisan politics. He asserts that his denunciations of Mr. Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts who is a Mormon, were religious and not political.
Mr. Keller regularly stated on his program his claim that Mr. Romney’s church did not represent “biblical Christianity.”
By making the investigation public, Mr. Keller says he is hoping to prompt a legal challenge to the I.R.S. prohibition. And he is not the only religious leader pursuing this strategy.
The Alliance Defense Fund, a conservative legal group, is recruiting 50 pastors to endorse candidates from the pulpit on Sept. 28, hoping to provoke a legal challenge to the I.R.S. code.
“We’re asking pastors to make specific recommendations based on Scripture as to how their congregations should vote,” said Erik Stanley, senior legal counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund.
Read about it here.
[From me]
To call Mr. Romney Satan is a stretch. To say he is the brother of Satan is another story since the Mormons believe Lucifer and Jesus were brothers. But I digress. I’ve made my view on this pretty clear. I don’t like the mix of politics and religion. I don’t think it was wrong for Mr. Keller to point out the differences between Christianity and Mormonism. I don’t have a problem with a pastor talking about the faith of candidates. But I think there is enough baggage in both parties to point out evil either way.
Why don’t we as a churches focus on ministering to people on both sides of the aisle and encourage our members to get involved in politics because it is their duty? We got our tax exempt statuses to transform our communities through service not being Political Action Committees.
What do you think?


