
[Guardian]
The strident secularism of Dawkins and Hitchens misses a bigger point. God doesn’t have to be great for religion to be worthwhile. Albert Einstein’s letter, containing a short rant about God and the Bible, sold recently for 25 times its expected price – thanks, in part, to professional atheist Richard Dawkins being one of the unsuccessful bidders. It’s long been said that religion is a racket. Sales figures of other anti-God rants – much longer than Einstein’s letter to Eric Gutkind – suggest that atheism may be catching up. But is it good for the atheists?
As we know, it helps to have a book in circulation. Dawkins’ recent work The God Delusion is nowhere near as big as the Bible, but shifting 1.5m copies is more than respectable. Book sales have a legitimizing effect. It’s not just the growing number of readers who may be converted by a polemic. Monetary success confers an impressive, almost magical, aura.
If atheism’s a commercial success, associated with a certain kind of high-flying, worldly proselytizer, we may yet see the advent of an atheist sect – reclusive ascetics who wish to distance themselves from the more ostentatious non-believers. Atheist sects? Not as crazy a concept as you might think. In New York, there has even been talk of a “church” - a physical house of non-worship – for atheists. Start a church and, even if you remove all mention of God, a schism seems inevitable.
Christopher Hitchens, declaring that “god is not great,” seems to have designed this phrase expressly to piss off the worshipful. Religion may be childish but so is a show of disrespect. If we’re so comfortable in our non-belief, do we need to go around nettling the believers?
While finishing my third novel, I faced a dilemma: whether to capitalise the G in God when referring to the Christian deity. God is more of a concept than a being to me, but the lower case “god” suggested by Hitchens just didn’t look right. If Nancy, Allison, and Jasmine (fictional prostitutes in my novel) require the upper case treatment, it seems democratic to do likewise for God, who is also a product of the imagination.
As a central character in so many other stories, God has legs, but I am not here to defend God’s greatness. Or legs. I prefer to say that God … is just OK.
Read the whole story here.
[From me]
I like what Ms. Quan has to say. I guess an Atheist can say what I’ve been asking for years better than me. If a person wants to be an atheist, agnostic, Mormon, Muslim, or whatever that is up to them. I will still pray and share my faith but I will respect their rights to believe what they want. A3 reminds me of Ms. Quan.
What do you think?