Nov 16 2007

Profile Image of Kevin Bussey
Kevin Bussey

New Orleans Mission Trip (Nov 07)-Day 4

Last night we went out to eat and had voodoo rolls.  Ummmm….   We walked across the street to see the progress that has been made on the pumps to the levies but it was cold and the wind was coming off the lake.

Today there is a group from Maryland working with us.  It is great to see so many churches and Christians coming together to help people they don’t even know.  I can’t put into words how bad it still is in the Gentilly area and the lower 9th Ward.  I would say in Gentilly only every 10th house is occupied and that may be an exaggeration.   Edgewater has been ministering to these people since Katrina hit.  This church is very important to the community.  I’m glad we got to be a small part.  This is my 4th time down here.  I’m very passionate about helping these victims because I lived through Katrina and 5 other hurricanes.  As I read about Cyclone Sidr slamming  Bangladesh, killing at least 1,100 and forcing 650,000 to flee I am heartbroken for them.  When you see how it affects people in person it moves you.

We were able to get the doors finished on the front of the church.  We stained and glossed about 30 doors.  We fixed holes, hung sheet rock, did plumbing and electrical all week.  We are tired but I wouldn’t trade this week for anything.  My 13 year old son Jacob was able to come because he is homeschooled and it was special to work with him.

Well, we are headed back to the Riverwalk–maybe we will see another New Orleans wedding.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

9 responses so far

9 Responses to “New Orleans Mission Trip (Nov 07)-Day 4”

  1. Joe Kennedyon 17 Nov 2007 at 5:33 pm 1

    thanks for coming again, kevin.

  2. Frank Busseyon 19 Nov 2007 at 11:18 am 2

    Thanks for your hard work for the Lord.

    I’m curious….. How many atheist groups did you see helping down there? I see many Christian groups expressing their compassion to help by traveling the long distance and working hard to help. Many do this over and over but I haven’t seen or heard of professing atheist groups doing the same.

    What kind of world would we have if all the Christians just stopped expressing their faith in Christ, closed their hospitals and charities and social work like the Salvation Army. Would the atheists step up to the bat to fill the massive vacuum. As the Beatles sang. “Imagine”. Imagine living in a compassionate USSR or Nazi Germany where Hitler had his plan to wipe out the Jews and all the Christians too.

    It seems the atheist’s compassion and drive is aimed at eliminating Christians and their publicly expressing their faith in Christ anywhere. ….. Just curious…..

    Dad

  3. AskAnAtheist.orgon 19 Nov 2007 at 11:56 am 3

    Well, now I’m convinced that the claims of Christianity, the virgin birth, the dead coming back to life, etc., must be true! After all, we have solid evidence that proves it: we don’t see organized groups of atheists helping others in the name of no-God ;)
    I do join you in wondering what the world would be like without religion and the associated wars and other atrocities in the name of God. When confronted with Christianity’s bloody past, Christians often respond that we should not judge a particular religion by the actions of its followers. What do you think?

  4. Frank Busseyon 19 Nov 2007 at 10:54 pm 4

    Yes, Askanatheist,
    I agree with you in some of your points.

    Jesus said, “By this shall all men know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.” Jesus gave you a test by which you can know which people are his and which ones are not his.

    Obviously imposter’s and false disciples tend to discredit true believers in the eyes of the world. Jesus warned us that there would be false teachers and professors who would come in his name.

    Reject those fake believers who do evil in the name of Christ and yet claim to know him…… Jesus said that by their fruits, you will know them. The trouble these fake Christians create is that men see their evil deeds done in the name of Christ and they reject Christ too, even though Christ warned us about these fakers and to reject them because they were not his.

    Look at Christ himself. Do you see any hypocrisy or lack of love in him? Examine his life. Have you ever seen anyone else in history as loving and profound as he? Christ died on the cross for my sins.That is love.

    Continue to compare us to Christ’s standards. Listen to those people who exhibit the Fruit of the Spirit, not the Works of the Flesh. The fakers you site, give true Christians a bad image but …….Jesus gave you the test to use. Way to go! ….You are using his test very well as far as you have gone. Go the rest of the way.

    Those of us who profess Christ will have to answer to him at his judgment seat as to how we represented him in this life.
    Jesus said that at the judgment many would would claim to be his and yet Jesus will tell them to depart from him because he never knew them.

    I apologize Askanatheist, for the hypocrites you site and sometimes I am one of them myself..

    Dad

  5. AskAnAtheist.orgon 20 Nov 2007 at 8:27 am 5

    Dad (Frank),

    Some of the most selfless, generous, and loving people I’ve personally met are Christian, some are atheist, some are Baha’i, and some are Buddhist. Yet not all would seem to be Jesus’ disciples. So the test seems to fail.

    I think the Christians you consider “impostors” would probably consider you an impostor as well since you don’t believe exactly the way they do. Surely charlatans exist, but simply holding opposing beliefs is not enough to quality one as a charlatan.

    Many others have selflessly chosen to die out of love, and their death was for much less of a noble cause than the salvation of mankind. Normal people seem to have that capacity.

  6. Frank Busseyon 21 Nov 2007 at 12:58 am 6

    Dear AskAnAtheist,

    First, shall I discount all atheists because Stalin murdered around ten million in Russia and the atheistic Maoists murdered countless millions in China and all atheistic evolutionists because Hitler murdered seven million to produce Friedrich Nietzsche’s master race by eliminating the “Jewish vermin”? I could go on.

    Second You misunderstand the test. The test Jesus gave, he addressed to his disciples who claimed to follow him. The other people you mention do not claim to follow Jesus no mater how nice they may be. Jesus’s test is not love only, but that any person who claims to be his follower and is unloving , Christ says the world will rightly reject the profession of those people.. This you keep doing. You are agreeing with what Jesus said you would do.

    Third - When anyone differs with me, let them show me in the Bible where I’m wrong. If they are right, they have done me a service and helped me see where I need to get in line with God’s truth. Hold me to the Biblical test, not a twisting of it.

    Can the Bible be misused? Yes! Jesus warned us that people would claim to come in his name and spread lies. I tell people, to not trust me but check up on every thing I say but use God;s Word as your standard. To me the greatest question in life is “What is Truth?” That I seek and so far the Bible is outstanding.

    Forth, you are right. Many people have died for noble causes they believed in. Man does have this capacity because we were made in the image of God in the beginning but we let sin come in to distort our understanding of God and of ourselves. ……The big difference between Jesus and those dedicated people is that none of them rose from the dead. Jesus did.

    Many people have tried to disprove the Bible by disproving the resurrection, only to reluctantly yield to the fact that the resurrection really happened. Many educated, skeptics, after their own personal study have been convinced against their biases to conclude it really happened. Josh McDowell, Frank Morrison, Lee Strobel…..

    May I suggest reading some of Lee Strobel’s books:
    “Case for Christ”,
    “Case for Faith”
    “Case for the Resurrection”.
    Lee is no slouch. He was an adamant atheist, Grad of Yale Law School, award winning investigative reporter for the Chicago Tribune (I think) and a hedonist….. His wife became a Believer which really ticked him off, almost to the point of divorce. He set out to prove her wrong and investigated the so-called facts of Christianity to disprove it. His detailed, fair research convinced him that the Bible is valid, the resurrection really happened and that Christ is the Son God. Yes, he is now a Believer.

    You are an intelligent person. Check out Strobel. His books are available on Amazon. I read books by atheists. I listen to their mp3 debates to hear their positions.

    Forgive my ramblings. I commend you for seeking the TRUTH.

    Frank

  7. AskAnAtheist.orgon 21 Nov 2007 at 9:11 am 7

    Frank,

    First, shall I discount all atheists because Stalin murdered around ten million in Russia…

    I think you are getting my point - if we should not judge Christianity or atheism by the evil deeds of its followers, then we also should not judge Christianity or atheism for the benevolent acts of its followers. Recall that this part of the discussion followed your statement:

    I’m curious….. How many atheist groups did you see helping down there? I see many Christian groups expressing their compassion to help by traveling the long distance and working hard to help. Many do this over and over but I haven’t seen or heard of professing atheist groups doing the same.

    Correct my if I misunderstood your earlier statement, but I understood that you were indicating that Christianity is better than atheism because you observed Christians, but no atheists, helping in New Orleans. And by extension, Christianity must be true as evidenced by this example of its followers.

    Second You misunderstand the test. The test Jesus gave, he addressed to his disciples who claimed to follow him. The other people you mention do not claim to follow Jesus no mater how nice they may be. Jesus’s test is not love only, but that any person who claims to be his follower and is unloving…

    Possibly I did misunderstand. Jesus is quoted in Joh 13:35 to say: “By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.” Taking this literally, Jesus indicates that the test applies to the people that Jesus was speaking to: the 12 disciples. I see no indication that the statement was meant to apply to others who claim to be followers of Jesus. Yet you said “Jesus gave you a test by which you can know which people are his and which ones are not his,” which is to say that we can use this test to know if any who claim to be followers of Jesus actually are. Am I to understand that you are taking the Bible literally, or that we can add our own interpretation to what is actually written? If we can add our own interpretation, then what is the rational behind presuming that Jesus meant any who claim to be followers, including those who will claim to be followers in the future? Is there a principal that goes beyond the actual statement - the principal being that love is always present in a true disciple?

    Ah! Then maybe I did understand after all ;) If the presence of love is an indicator of discipleship, then it should not be found in non-disciples. That is, if love can be found both in disciples and non-disciples, then love cannot be used as an indicator since it is no discriminator between disciples and non-disciples. I have seen love present in both Christians (who claim discipleship) as well as non-Christians (who do not claim discipleship) - this is evidence that love is present in non-disciples. Joh 13:35 implies that there are people who claim to be disciples but who are not. Yet as we can see, non-disciples can have love. Therefore love is no test.

    So far, we have been talking about love but we have not really defined it. I’ll propose my own test: that given a reasonable definition of love (that is, a definition that is generally useful; its usefulness extends beyond this immediate discussion), then then we would find that most everyone would posses love in varying degrees. We would either have to arbitrarily decide how much love was required for discipleship, or we would have to conclude that no one is a disciple or that everyone who claims to be a disciple is a disciple according to the test in Joh 13:35.

    Christ says the world will rightly reject the profession of those people.. This you keep doing. You are agreeing with what Jesus said you would do.

    I don’t understand how this supports what you have said. Could you explain?

    Third - When anyone differs with me, let them show me in the Bible where I’m wrong. If they are right, they have done me a service and helped me see where I need to get in line with God’s truth. Hold me to the Biblical test, not a twisting of it.

    I respect you for your willingness to be proven wrong. That is a quality that is sorely lacking today. The best way to arrive at what is right is to allow ourselves to be proven wrong - to purge ourselves of incorrect beliefs. I try to be like that as well.

    What if one wanted to challenge your belief that the Bible is incorrect (specifically, that it is not the inerrant Word of God)? Since it would make little sense to prove it by the using the Bible (that would presuppose that the Bible was indeed the inerrant Word of God, which is the belief being challenged), that would make little sense. In that case, what would you consider to be an authoritative source?

    Can the Bible be misused? Yes! Jesus warned us that people would claim to come in his name and spread lies. I tell people, to not trust me but check up on every thing I say but use God;s Word as your standard. To me the greatest question in life is “What is Truth?” That I seek and so far the Bible is outstanding.

    I applaud you again for not asking me simply to believe without evidence. How does this extend to asking me to believe that the Bible is the Word of God (again, without asking me to believe the bible a priori, without evidence that it truly is the Word of God)?

    Forth, you are right. Many people have died for noble causes they believed in. Man does have this capacity because we were made in the image of God in the beginning but we let sin come in to distort our understanding of God and of ourselves. ……The big difference between Jesus and those dedicated people is that none of them rose from the dead. Jesus did.

    That is a significant difference that would cause me to believe. My obstacle is that I don’t know of good reasons to believe that the stories about Jesus’ resurrection.

    Many people have tried to disprove the Bible by disproving the resurrection, only to reluctantly yield to the fact that the resurrection really happened. Many educated, skeptics, after their own personal study have been convinced against their biases to conclude it really happened. Josh McDowell, Frank Morrison, Lee Strobel…..

    I have seen these books and read parts of them (on Kevin’s recommendation!) but I haven’t read them cover to cover. I have to admit that the parts that I did read were not very convincing, which is the reason I didn’t read the books from cover to cover. Maybe I will read them anyway. From the parts I did read, Strobel seems to present only the parts of the arguments that support his case. Given only what Strobel reveals to the reader, I think it is perfectly reasonable to believe his claims - that the resurrection is true, for example. However, Strobel either intentionally, or out of ignorance, fails to present the arguments that would either refute his claims, or arguments that would prove that parts of the Bible story are false. I agree with you that Strobel is intelligent, has a law background, and is an experience as a journalist. Since he never claims to present a FAIR case, but only the case FOR Christ, Christianity, etc., I tend to believe that his omissions were intentional. As a lawyer, he would have to know that any case has arguments for and arguments against; he is presenting only the arguments for in his books. Also as a lawyer, he must know that the judge (the judicious reader in this case) will decide based on hearing both sets of arguments. Sadly, I haven’t heard many Fundamentalists consider the cases against. I do find that “liberal” (i.e., non-Fundamentalist) Christians are somewhat more likely to consider other arguments.

    I read books by atheists. I listen to their mp3 debates to hear their positions.

    I’m glad to hear that! You are one of the few Fundamentalists (I’m guessing you are - based on your relationship to Kevin and the few posts I’ve seen on this blog) who does. You are becoming one of my heroes :) What are some of the books you’ve read? What are some of the mp3’s you’ve listened to?

    Forgive my ramblings. I commend you for seeking the TRUTH.

    Only if you forgive mine! I am enjoying your posts! :)

  8. AskAnAtheist.orgon 21 Nov 2007 at 9:11 am 8

    Oops! sorry - i messed up the quotes…

  9. Frank Busseyon 21 Nov 2007 at 11:11 am 9

    ASKANATHEIST,
    THANKS FOR THE DEBATE. I DON’T HAVE THE TIME PRESENTLY TO ADDRESS ALL YOUR POSITIONS BUT I WILL LATER. I am pressed for time right now.

    I’ve read Bertrand Russell and Nietzsche etc.

    Mp3’s I’ve listened to hostile to the Christian position = Brian Edwards, Peter Atkins, Pete Harty, Reggie Finley, Madeline Murray OHaire, Dr Dale Miller, Dr Gerd Ludemann, Frank Zindler, Dr. Tabash and more

    Although I believe the Fundamentals of the Faith, I avoid the pejorative title “Fundamentalist”. Most, but not all who have claimed this tag have been unloving and closed minded.

    I am always searching for the truth….. If I have the truth, I do not defend it but try to present it effectively. Truth always stands up to error if presented correctly to those who are willing to honestly consider it.

    Jesus is my hero and example. He was the friend of prostitutes, tax collectors and sinners but confronted the proud and smug “religious Pharisees” but he also took time with inquiring Nicodemus, the Pharisee who came to him by night so as not to be seen.

    May our real debate be about Jesus, not about intellectual hair splitting . I need to be ready to answer all who asks about my faith in him and his word.

    I’ll pray for you AskAnAtheist, not to aggree with me but that you and I will know the truth. God gives wisdom to all who ask James 1:5

    Frank.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply